← Models

Market sizing

The same market built top-down from population and bottom-up from outlets, then reconciled into a serviceable opportunity.

Top-down market ($mm)

$815

Bottom-up market ($mm)

$806

Top-down / bottom-up

1.0x

Midpoint ($mm)

$811

Revenue opportunity ($mm)

$65

The download carries your own inputs, keeps every formula live and colours inputs blue exactly like the template. The share link reopens this page with your assumptions in place.

Click any highlighted cell to change an assumption. Black cells are formulas — you can retype those too, using Excel syntax such as =B5*(1+B6).

 ABC
1Market sizing model
2Top-down and bottom-up on one page. If they disagree by more than about 2x, an assumption is wrong.
3
4Top-down
5Population (mm)10.5
6Share in target age band42.0%
7Penetration (own the product)55.0%
8Units per owner per year1.4
9Average price ($)$240
10Target customers (mm)2.4
11Units per year (mm)3.4
12Market size ($mm)$815
13
14
15Bottom-up
16Outlets in market5,600
17Units per outlet per week12.0
18Weeks open per year50
19Average price ($)$240
20Units per year (mm)3.4
21Market size ($mm)$806
22
23
24Reconciliation
25Top-down / bottom-up1.0x
26Midpoint estimate ($mm)$811
27Serviceable share you could win8.0%
28Revenue opportunity ($mm)$65
29
30Round aggressively out loud; keep the exact arithmetic here.

Drills on this model

Answer out loud first, then change the cell and see how close you were.

  1. 1.Halve penetration and double units per owner. Why does the market barely move, and which assumption would you actually defend?
  2. 2.Push the two methods more than 2x apart, then find the assumption that reconciles them.
  3. 3.Re-do the top-down for a market of 68 million people. Estimate the answer out loud first, then check it here.
  4. 4.At an 8% serviceable share, how many outlets would you need to serve it at current throughput?